So, Verizon's about to swing the axe on 15,000 jobs, huh? Biggest bloodbath in their history, they're saying. Color me shocked. Not really. Verizon Jobs Cut Biggest in Company History—Report
The "Leaner" Verizon: Less Employees, Same Bullshit
The official line is always the same, ain't it? "Streamlining," "cost-cutting," "critical inflection point." It's corporate bingo. New CEO Dan Schulman, fresh from PayPal, is gonna "shake things up" and make Verizon "simpler, leaner, and scrappier." Translation: Fewer people doing more work for the same crummy pay, while he pockets a bigger bonus.
And let's be real, "leaner" usually means "meaner" for the folks on the ground. I picture middle managers right now, sweating bullets, trying to figure out how to justify their existence while simultaneously brown-nosing the new boss.
They're spinning it like it's all about competition from AT&T and T-Mobile. Okay, sure, they lost some postpaid subscribers. But is that really the reason? Or is it because Verizon's been coasting on its name for too long, offering the same mediocre service at a premium price?
Verizon Chairman Mark Bertolini whining about losing market share? Give me a break. "The network isn't as differentiated as it used to be," he says. Well, duh. Everyone's got 5G now. The game's changed, and Verizon's playing checkers while everyone else is playing chess. Or, more accurately, everyone else is also playing checkers, but they're charging less for it.
The Franchise Shell Game
Here's the kicker: They're not really eliminating 15,000 jobs, are they? They're "converting" 200 retail stores into franchises. Meaning those employees aren't gone, they're just… off the books. Verizon washes its hands of them, and some poor sap of a franchisee gets to deal with managing them. It's like a corporate magic trick: poof, the debt is gone!

It's financial engineering at its finest. Screw the workers, pad the bottom line. What's next? Are they gonna franchise out the customer service department? "Hi, welcome to Verizon Customer Support, now independently owned and operated. Please hold while I try to figure out how this damn system works."
And what about the employees who are getting laid off? The article mentions they're targeting non-union management ranks. Which, offcourse, sounds good on paper. But how many of those "managers" are just glorified paper-pushers who've been with the company for 20 years and have families to feed? Are they getting a decent severance package? Retraining opportunities? Or just a pat on the back and a "good luck"? Details are scarce, surprise, surprise.
It's spreading out too. It's not just Verizon. We're seeing Condé Nast and Amazon doing the same thing. Layoffs left and right, and it's spooking people. Even the ones who aren't getting canned are worried. "Anxiety, insecurity, and resentment," that's what one expert called it. Sounds about right. As Verizon and other big orgs announce layoffs, is it spooking your employees?
HR's trying to spin it, too. "Transparency," they say. "Communicate with empathy." Yeah, right. Like they're gonna tell you the real reason you're getting fired. It's always some BS about "restructuring" or "performance issues." Never the truth: "We just don't need you anymore."
The AI Elephant in the Room
And let's not forget the giant, AI-shaped elephant in the room. How much of this is really about competition, and how much is about replacing human workers with algorithms? Verizon ain't gonna admit it, but you know it's a factor. Why pay a human to answer phones when you can have a chatbot do it for free? (And frustrate the hell out of customers in the process.)
I wonder, are these new cost-cutting measures going to actually improve things? Or will it just be a race to the bottom, with Verizon slashing jobs and services until it's a hollow shell of its former self? Because honestly, at this point, it feels like they're just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
